This is an outdated version published on 2021-12-27. Read the most recent version.

METHODS FOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY EVALUATION AMONG THE WORKING POPULATION

Authors

  • Dragana Bislimovska Institute of Occupational Health of R.N. Macedonia

Keywords:

physical activity health paradox, workers, subjective methods, objective methods

Abstract

The high incidence of physical inactivity in the last decades increases the need for development and use of lifestyle interventions that promote physical activity, especially among the working population.

The levels of occupational and leisure time physical activity differ and are specific among workers form different occupations, often creating opposing health effects or the so called “physical activity health paradox”.

The aim of this paper is to present different methods for physical activity evaluation, and to determine the best methodological approach for the evaluation of the physical activity and its domains among the working population.

Through literature review, the most common methods for physical activity evaluation among the working population are shown: subjective (interview, self-reported questionnaires and physical activity logs), objective (measurement of energy expenditure, physiological measurements, use of motion sensors) and combined methods (subjective-objective).

Criteria for selection of corresponding methodological approach for physical activity evaluation among the working population are discussed, including the characteristics of the examined population and the used methods (quality, objectivity, level of work load, cost-effectiveness, specific limitations).

The obtained data will help create recommendations for interventions for health promotion among the working population.

References

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. PublicHealthRep 1985;100:126–131.

Virkkunen H, Härmä M, Kauppinen T. The triad of shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload and risk of coronary heart disease. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:378–86.

Labour Regulations Law. Official Gazette of RM No. 74/15.

International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-08. International Labour Office- Geneva: ILO, 2012.

Brown JR, Crowden GP. Energy expenditure ranges and muscular work grades. Brit J Industr Med 1963, 20, 277.

HeritageTeManatuTaonga. Defining and measuring occupations [Internet]. 1. – Occupational structure – TeAra Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Ministry for Culture and Heritage TeManatuTaonga; 2016. Available from: https://teara.govt.nz/ (Cited 24.10.2021).

Amidu N, Owiredu WK, Mireku EK, Agyemang C. Metabolic syndrome among garage workers in the automobile industry in Kumasi, Ghana. J Med Biomed Sci 2012;1:29-36.

Physical activity. World Health Organization. 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity. (Cited 17.10.2021).

Nooijen CFJ, del Pozo-Cruz B, Nyberg G, et al. Are changes in occupational physical activity level compensated by changes in exercise behavior?, Euro J Pub Health 2018; 28(5): 940–943.

Virkkunen H, Härmä M, Kauppinen T. The triad of shift work, occupational noise, and physical workload and risk of coronary heart disease. Occup Environ Med 2006;63:378–86.

Sorić M. Ključni pojmovi i epidemiologija tjelesne (ne)aktivnosti. Во: Babić Z, Pintarić H, Mišigoj-Duraković M, Miličić D Sportska kardiologija- Kardiologija sporta, tjelesne i radne akivnosti. Zagreb: Medicinska naklada; 2018. стр. 14-20.

Clays E, Lidegaard M, De Bacquer D, et al. The combined relationship of occupational and leisure-time physical activity with all-cause mortality among men, accounting for physical fitness. AmJEpidemiol 2015;179(559):566.

Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Riihimäki H, et al. Leisure time physical activity and strenuousness of work as predictors of physical functioning: a 28 year follow up of a cohort of industrial employees Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004;61:1032-38.

Kirk MA, Rhodes RE. Occupation correlates of adults’ participation in leisure-timephysical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:476–85.

Silfee VJ, Haughton CF, Jake-Schoffman DE, Lopez-Cepero A, May CN, Sreedhara M, Rosal MC, Lemon SC. Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: A systematic review. Preventive medicine reports. 2018;11:74-80.

Dunn A.L., Andersen R.E., Jakicic J.M. Lifestyle physical activity interventions: history, short-and long-term effects, and recommendations. Am. J. Prev. Med. 1998;15(4):398–412.

Kahn E.B., Ramsey L.T., Brownson R.C. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2002;22(4):73–107.

Kelly P., Fitzsimons C., Baker G. Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2016;13(1):1.

Sylvia LG, Bernstein EE, Hubbard JL, Keating L, Anderson EJ. Practical guide to measuring physical activity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(2):199-208.

Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A, Ghigo E, van der Ploeg H, Ekelund U, Maciaszek J, Stemplewski R, Tomczak M. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study. Int J of Behev Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2018;15(1):1-33.

Јacobs DR, Ainsworth BE, Hartman TJ, Leon AS. A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25:81–91.

Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Swartz AM. Comparison of the College Alumnus Questionnaire physical activity index with objective monitoring.Ann Epidemiol. 2004; 14:409–415.

Strath SJ, Kaminsky LA, Ainsworth BE, Ekelund U, Freedson PS, Gary RA, Richardson CR, Smith DT, Swartz AM. Guide to the assessment of physical activity: clinical and research applications: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128(20):2259-79.

Quiles NN, McCullough AK, Piao L. Validity and Reliability of the Exercise Vital Sign Questionnaire in an Ethnically Diverse Group: A Pilot Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019;10:2150132719844062.

Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ] – Short and Long Form, 2005. Available from: www.biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk (Cited 15.09.2021).

Bennie JA, Pedisic Z, Timperio A, Crawford D, Dunstan D, Bauman A, van Uffelen J, Salmon J. Total and domain-specific sitting time among employees in desk-based work settings in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015;39(3):237-42.

Medina C, Barquera S, Janssen I. Validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire among adults in Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;34(1):21–8.

Moreira-Silva I, Azevedo J, Rodrigues S, Seixas A, Jorge M. Predicting musculoskeletal symptoms in workers of a manufacturing company. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;24:1-9.

Wilke C, Ashton P, Elis T, Biallas B, Froböse I. Analysis of work ability and work-related physical activity of employees in a medium-sized business. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:803.

Hanna F, Daas RN, El-Shareif TJ, Al-Marridi HH, Al-Rojoub ZM, Adegboye OA. The Relationship Between Sedentary Behavior, Back Pain, and Psychosocial Correlates Among University Employees. Front Public Health. 2019;7:80

Westerterp KR. Assessment of physical activity: a critical appraisal. European journal of applied physiology. 2009;105(6):823-8.

Human Kinetics. 2021. Available methods for measuring physical activity. Available from: https://us.humankinetics.com/blogs/excerpt/available-methods-for-measuring-physical-activity (Cited 21.10.2021).

Skotte J, Korshøj M, Kristiansen J, Hanisch C, Holtermann A. Detection of physical activity types using triaxial accelerometers. J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):76-84.

Gupta N, Hallman DM, Mathiassen SE, Aadahl M, Jørgensen MB, Holtermann A. Are temporal patterns of sitting associated with obesity among blue-collar workers? A cross sectional study using accelerometers. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:148.

Stemland I, Ingebrigtsen J, Christiansen CS, Jensen BR, Hanisch C, Skotte J, Holtermann A. Validity of the Acti4 method for detection of physical activity types in free-living settings: comparison with video analysis. Ergonomics. 2015;58(6):953-65.

Miller R, Brown W. Meeting physical activity guidelines and average daily steps in a working population. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2004;1(3):218-26.

Al-Mohannadi AS, Sayegh S, Ibrahim I, Salman A, Farooq A. Effect of a pedometer-based walking challenge on increasing physical activity levels amongst hospital workers. Arch Public Health. 2019;77:40.

Mathew V, Akkilagunta S, Kumar D, Lakshminarayanan S, Kar SS. Effectiveness of Pedometer-Based Walking Program to Improve Physical Activity of Workers in a Software Industry: An Experimental Study. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:49.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-27

Versions

Issue

Section

Review Article