DO FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS NEED ASSISTANCE IN ADOPTING HIGHER LEVEL OF LEARNING STRATEGIES?
Keywords:
medical students, first-year, learning strategies, extent of implementation, MSLQ.Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to estimate the level to which the students at the beginning of medical studies are familiarized with strategies for learning in order to explore where and how to assist at the very beginning of their learning.
Methods: A total of 368 1st to 6th year medical students at Ss. Cyril & Methodius University, Skopje, (North Macedonia) filled out the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In this questionnaire-based, cross-sectional, observational study emphasis was given to the first-year students (n=109). Cohort distribution was determined according to scores expressing the level of practicing instruments of each learning strategy. Percentiles and lowest scores were used for tracing the least adopted strategies.
Results: Majority of the first-year students (52.49%) use learning strategies at medium level, 26.60% at high and 20.89% at low level. For three subscale areas the percentile of students practicing at low level is especially high (39.45% for critical thinking, 40.36% for peer learning and 36.69% for help seeking). For these subscales also students’ scores have the lowest values.
Conclusion: Our first-year students use a different level of learning strategies. As 20.89% of students practice less than 55% of the instruments of each learning strategy and critical thinking, peer learning and help seeking (shown to be less adopted) are basic instruments for deeper and effective learning, the need to assist the first-year students in better adopting learning strategies is obvious.
References
Subasinghe SD, Wanniachchi DN. Approaches to learning and the academic performance of a group of medical students-any correlation? Stud Med J 2009; 3: 5-10. Corpus ID: 53318482.
Weinstein C. Mayer R. The teaching of learning strategies. In: Wittrock M, editor. Handbook of Research on Teaching. 3rd ed. New York: MacMillan 1986; p: 315-327.
Weinstein C, Mayer R. The teaching of learning strategies. Innovation Abstracts 1983; 5(32). file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/ED237180.pdf.
Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH. Self-regulated learning and performance. In: BJ. Zimmerman, Schunk DH, editors. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge 2011; p: 1-12.
Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Pract 2002; 41(2): 64-70. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Chonkar SP, Ha TC, Hang Chu SS, Xinhui NgA, Lim M, et al. The predominant learning approaches of medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18:17-25. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1122-5.
Shaista H, Singaram VS. Motivated strategies for learning and their association with academic performance of a diverse group of 1st-year medical students. Afr J Health Prof Educ 2016; 8(1): 104-7. doi: 10.7196/AJHPE.2016.v8i1.757.
Kim KJ, Jang HW. Changes in medical students’ motivation and self-regulated learning: a preliminary study. Int J Med Educ 2015; 6: 213-5. doi:10.5116/ijme.565e.of87.
Wickramasinghe DP, Samarasekera DN. Factors influencing the approaches to studding of preclinical and clinical students and postgraduate trainees. BMC Med Educ 2011; 11: 22-8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-22.
Bickerdike A, O’Deasmhunaigh C, O’Flynn S, O’Tuathaigh C. Learning strategies, study habits and social networking activity of undergraduate medical students. Int J Med Educ 2016; 7: 230-6. doi:10.5116/ijme.576f.d074.
Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen A. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ 2012; 46(7): 678-88. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2923.2012.04284.x.
Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, García T, McKeachie WJ. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 1991.
Pintrich P, Roeser RW, De Groot EAM. Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents’ motivation and self-regulated learning. J Early Adolesc 1994; 14(2): 139-61. doi: 10.1177/027243169401400204.
Barker JR, Olsen JP. Medical students learning strategies: Evaluation of first-year changes. University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Institutional Research, Jackson MS, 2002. https://www.msacad.org/journal/ejour2.html.
Cazan AM. Psychometric properties of cognitive self-regulation MSLQ scales. Rom J Exp Appl Psychol 2011; 2(1): 49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.227.
Cazan AM. Validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire on a Romanian sample. Project: Self-regulated learning in academic context. Rev Psih 2017; 63(3): 151-62.
Rotgans J, Schmidts H. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: A Measure for Students' General Motivational Beliefs and Learning Strategies. Asia-Pac Educ Res 2010; 19(2): 357-69. doi:10.3860/taper.v19i2.1603.
McKeachie WJ, Pintrich PR, Lin YG, Smith DA. Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. A Review of the Research Literature, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Michigan, 1987.
Frenkel S. Metacognitive Components in Learning to Learn Approaches, Int J Psychol: Biopsychosocial App 2014; 14: 95-112. doi:10.7220/2345-024X.14.5.
Roman JM, Gallego S. ACRA escalas de estrategias de aprendizaje. Madrid: TEA Ediciones 1994.
International Test Commission, International Guidelines on Test Adaptation, Available from: https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation.pdf.
Shurbanovska O, Blazhevska-Stoilkova B. Expectancy as a Mediator of the Relation between Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement among University Students, Psihološka istraživanja. 2013; XVI(1): 17-27.
Pintrich PR, Smith, DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated for Learning Strategies Questionnaire (MSLQ). EPM 1993; 53(3): 801-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.
Barker JR, Olsen JP. Medical students’ learning strategies: Evaluation of first-year changes. J Educ Psych 1995; 80: 321-31.
Vaculíková J. The Third Round of the Czech Validation of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Int Educ Stud 2016; 9(7): 35-46. doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n7p35.
McSorley ME. The construct equivalence of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for a South African context. Unpublished masters’ treatise, University of Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth; 2004.
Anais MJ, Hojas AM, Bustos A, Letelier C, Zuzulich MS, Cabieses B, et al. Motivational and Cognitive Learning Strategies Used by First-Year Engineering Undergraduate Students at Universidad Catolica in Chile. Creat Educ 2012; 3 (Special issue): 811-17. doi:10.4236/ce.2012.326121.
Hamid S, Singaram VS. Motivated strategies for learning and their association with academic performance of a diverse group of 1st-year medical students. AJOL 2016; 8(1): 104-7. doi:10.7196/AJHPE.2016.V8I1.757.
Samarakoon L, Fernando Th, Rodrigo Ch, Rajapakse S. Learning styles and approaches among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ 2013; 13(1): 42-7. doi: 0.1186/1472-6920-13-42.
Cho KK, Marjadi B, Langendyk V, Hu W. Medical student changes in self-regulated learning during the transition to the clinical environment. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17: 59. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0902-7.
Wolters C, Pintrich P, Karabenick S. Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In: Moore K, Lippman L, eidtors. What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development. New York: Springer 2005; p: 251-70.
Milenkova L, Mitevska E, Kakasheva-Mazenkovska L, Petrova-Kostadinova I, Gerasimovska Z. Introduction of small-group active learning: how students’ activities and the teacher's role in learning are being changed. Skopje: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Histology and Embryology; 2021. Project No. 1712/3.
Gokhale AA. Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. J Tech Educ 1995; 7(1): 22-30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2.
Garcia T, Pintrich PR. Assessing students’ motivation and learning strategies: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1995; San Francisco, CA. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 383770.
Aleven V, Mclaren B, Roll I, Koedinger K. Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a Cognitive Tutor. IJAIED 2006; 16(2): 101-28.
Baker R, Gowda SM, Corbett AT. Automatically detecting a student's preparation for future learning: Help use is key. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on educational data mining; 2011; p: 179-88.
Bartholomé T, Stahl E, Pieschl S, Bromme R. What matters in help-seeking? A study of help effectiveness and learner-related factors. Comput Hum Behav 2006; 22(1): 113-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.007.
Roll I, Aleven V, McLaren BM, Koedinger KR. Improving students’ help seeking skills using Metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction 2011; 21(2): 267-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.07.004.
Sobral DT. An appraisal of medical students’ reflection-in-learning. Med Educ 2000; 34(3): 183-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00473.x.
Renzulli SJ. Using Learning Strategies to Improve the Academic Performance of University Students on Academic Probation. NACADA J 2015; 35(1): 29-41. doi: 10.12930/NACADA-13-043.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-12-30 (2)
- 2021-12-27 (1)
