MACULAR THICKNESS CHANGES EVALUATED BY OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN CORRELATION WITH GLUCOSE AND HBA1C PARAMETERS AFTER SWITCHING DIABETES TREATMENT FROM ORAL HYPOGLYCEMICS TO INSULIN THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

Authors

  • Ivana Petkovska Specialized Eye Hospital ”Promedika Ophthalmology”- Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Keywords:

type 2 diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, oral hypoglycemics, insulin

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the impact of insulin therapy in the initial period on central macular thickness evaluated by optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study including 12 patients (24 eyes) with type 2 diabetes with or without DME was conducted. Patients had been treated only with oral hypoglycemics before inclusion in the study, and all of them were prescribed additional insulin therapy at the time of enrollment in the study. The main outcome parameters were changes in visual acuity (BCVA) and changes in central subfield thickness (CST) measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Additional variables analyzed included HbA1c, serum glucose, blood pressure, triglycerides, and cholesterol and their correlation with clinical findings. The examinations were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months after initiation of diabetes treatment with insulin.

Results: In all 12 subjects (24 eyes studied), no change in BCVA was observed. The laboratory parameters for glucose and HbA1c were analyzed, and at each follow-up showed a satisfactory reduction and stabilization of the results. From an anatomical point of view, CST showed minimal deterioration in 20 examined eyes - 209.3 μm to 240.21 μm (p<0.001). The mean HbA1c levels showed better results after insulin therapy.

Conclusion: This study suggests that in the initial phase of insulin therapy compared to oral antidiabetic agents, no decrease in visual acuity was observed, but changes in the anatomical structure of the macular region and macular volume occurred.

References

Zhang J, Ma J, Zhou N, Zhang B, An J. Insulin use and risk of diabetic macular edema in diabetes mellitus: a systemic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 929-936. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892056.

Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein RE, Lee PP, Agardh CD, Davis M, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema disease severity scales. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(9): 1677-1682. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00475-5.

Wu L, Fernandez-Loaiza P, Sauma J, Hernandez-Bogantes E, Masis M. Classification of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema. World J Diabetes 2013; 4(6): 290-294. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v4.i6.290.

Ciulla TA, Amador AG, Zinman B. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies. Diabetes Care 2003; 26(9): 2653-2664. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653

Aroca PR, Salvat M, Fernández J, Méndez I. Risk factors for diffuse and focal macular edema. J Diabetes Complications 2004; 18(4): 211-215. doi: 10.1016/S1056-8727(03)00038-2.

Nesper PL, Soetikno BT, Zhang HF, Fawzi AA. OCT angiography and visible-light OCT in diabetic retinopathy. Vision Res 2017; 139: 191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.05.006.

Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102(4): 520-526. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030398010.

Meng D, Mei A, Liu J, Kang X, Shi X, Qian R, et al. NADPH oxidase 4 mediates insulin-stimulated HIF-1α and VEGF expression, and angiogenesis in vitro. PLoS One 2012; 7(10): e48393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048393.

Zhao C, Wang W, Xu D, Li H, Li M, Wang F. Insulin and risk of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: data from a meta-analysis of seven cohort studies. Diagn Pathol 2014; 9: 130. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-130.

Yuksel B, Karti O, Celik O, Kerci SG, Kusbeci T. Low frequency ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Clin Exp Optom 2018; 101(1): 116-122. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12586.

de Salles MC, Epstein D. Real-life study of the use of anti-VEGF therapy versus dexamethasone implant for treatment of macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 259(9): 2653-2660. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05146-8.

Gale R, Pikoula M, Lee AY, Denaxas S, Egan C, Tufail A, Real world evidence on 5661 patients treated for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal dexamethasone or macular laser. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105(4): 549-554. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-315836.

Capone A Jr, Singer MA, Dodwell DG, Dreyer RF, Oh KT, Roth DB, et al. Efficacy and safety of two or more dexamethasone intravitreal implant injections for treatment of macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion (Shasta study). Retina 2014; 34(2): 342-351. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318297f842.

Giuffrè C, Cicinelli MV, Marchese A, Coppola M, Parodi MB, Bandello F. Simultaneous intravitreal dexamethasone and aflibercept for refractory macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020; 258(4): 787-793. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04577-8.

Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102(4): 527-532. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030405011.

Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 1984; 91(12): 1464-1474. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1.

Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, Manley SE, Holman RR, Matthews DR, et al. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116(3): 297-303. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.3.297.

Nathan D, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, Davis M, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(14): 977-986. doi: 10.1056/ NEJM199309303291401.

Lam PY, Chow SC, Lam WC, Chow LLW, Fung NSK. Management of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Diabetic Mellitus: Ophthalmologic Outcomes in Intensive versus Conventional Glycemic Control 2021; 15: 2767-2785. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S301317.

de Fine Olivarius N, Andreasen AH. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study. Lanset 1998; 352(9144): 1933; author reply 1934. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)60423-0.

Townsend RR, Kapoor SC. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1994; 330(9): 641; author reply 642. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199403033300914.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

Issue

Section

Original Articles