COMPARATIVE VALUE OF DIASTOLIC AND SYSTOLIC RESPONSES DURING PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR THE DETECTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

Authors

  • Valentina Andova University Clinic for Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Planinka Zafirovska Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Goce Delcev, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Vasil Papestiev University Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Emilija Antova University Clinic for Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Menka Lazareska Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Goce Delcev, Stip, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Ljubica Georgievska-Ismail University Clinic for Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

Keywords:

Stress echocardiography, diastolic function, coronary artery disease, wall motion score index, global longitudinal strain, pharmacologic stress

Abstract

Introduction: Stress echocardiography (SE) is primarily based on systolic parameters. Although diastolic dysfunction may occur early during ischemia, the diagnostic value of diastolic assessment during pharmacologic SE remains uncertain.

Aim: To evaluate the frequency of diastolic dysfunction during pharmacologic SE and its association with angiographically confirmed obstructive CAD, in comparison with conventional systolic parameters.

Matrial and methods: We prospectively evaluated 61 patients who underwent dipyridamole or dobutamine SE followed by coronary angiography. Systolic parameters included wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular ejection fraction, systolic tissue Doppler velocity (s′TDI), and global longitudinal strain (GLS%). Diastolic assessment included transmitral inflow velocities, deceleration time (DT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), tissue Doppler e′ velocities, E/e′ ratio, and left atrial volume. Parameters were measured at rest and peak stress, and delta values were calculated.

Results: Obstructive CAD was present in 20 patients (32.8%). Systolic parameters, particularly WMSI, significantly differentiated patients with and without CAD. ΔWMSI and Δs′TDI were significantly greater in patients with CAD, whereas GLS% showed non-significant, opposite trends between groups. Diastolic parameters demonstrated expected physiological stress responses, including shortening of DT and IVRT and increased e′ velocities, but neither peak values nor stress-induced changes differed significantly between patients with and without CAD. No diastolic delta parameter provided incremental diagnostic value for CAD detection.

Conclusion: During pharmacologic SE, conventional systolic parameters remain superior for identifying obstructive CAD. Diastolic indices appear largely influenced by heart rate and loading conditions and do not improve diagnostic discrimination beyond standard systolic assessment.

References

British Heart Foundation. Heart&Circulatory Disease Statistics 2021. https://www.bhf.org.uk/what-we-do/our-research/heart-statistics/heart-statistics-publications/cardiovascular-disease-statistics-2021

Raynolds HR, Diaz A, Cyr DD, Shaw LJ, John Mancini GB, et al. Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries. Insights from the ISCHEMIA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2023; 16(1): 63-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.015.

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2024; 45(36): 3415-3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.

Sicari R, Cortigiani L. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2017; 15(1): 7. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0099-2.

Pellikka PA, Arruda-Olson A, Chaudhry FA, Chen MH, Marshall JE, Porter TR, et al. Guidelines for Performance, Interpretation, and Application of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease: From the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2020; 33(1): 1-41.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.07.001.

Steeds RP, Wheeler R, Bhattacharyya S, Reiken J, Nihoyannopoulos P, Senior R, et al. Stress echocardiography in coronary artery disease: practical guidelines from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 2019; 6(2): G17-G33. doi: 10.1530/ERP-18-0068.

Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, Chaudhry FA, Donal E, Dulgheru R, et al. The Clinical Use of Stress Echocardiography in Non-Ischaemic Heart Disease: Recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017; 30(2): 101-138. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.016.

Picano E, Pierard L, Peteiro J, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Sade LE, Cortigiani L, et al. The clinical use of stress echocardiography in chronic coronary syndromes and beyond coronary artery disease: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the ESC. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2024; 25(2): e65-e90. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jead250.

Burgess MI, Jenkins C, Sharman JE, Marwick TH. Diastolic stress echocardiography: hemodynamic validation and clinical significance of estimation of ventricular filling pressure with exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47(9): 1891-900. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2006.02.042.

el-Said ES, Roelandt JR, Fioretti PM, McNeill AJ, Forster T, Boersma H, et al. Abnormal left ventricular early diastolic filling during dobutamine stress Doppler echocardiography is a sensitive indicator of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24(7): 1618-24. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90165-1.

Cain P, Baglin T, Case C, Spicer D, Short L, Marwick TH. Application of Tissue Doppler to interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography and comparison with quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87(5): 525-531. doi: 10.1016/ s0002-9149(00)01425-9.

Hoffmann S, Mogelvang R, Olsen NT, Sogaard P, Fritz-Hansen T, Bech J, et al. Tissue Doppler echocardiography reveals distinct patterns of impaired myocardial velocities in different degrees of coronary artery disease. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11(6): 544-549. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq015.

Bangalore S, Yao SS, Chaudhry FA. Role of left atrial size in risk stratification and prognosis of patients undergoing stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50(13): 1254-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.025.

Ha JW, Andersen OS, Smiseth OA. Diastolic Stress Test: Invasive and Noninvasive Testing. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2020; 13(1 Pt 2): 272-282. doi: 10.1016/j. jcmg.2019.01.037.

Nagueh SF, Sanborn DY, Oh JK, Anderson B, Billek K, et a. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography and for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction diagnosis: An update from the American Society of echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025; 38: 537-69. doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2025.03.011.

Yao SS, Qureshi E, Sherrid MV, Chaudhry FA. Practical applications in stress echocardiography: risk stratification and prognosis in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42(6): 1084-1090. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00923-9.

Antoniou N, Iliopoulou S, Raptis DG, Grammenos O, Kalaitzoglou M, Chrysikou M, et al. Global Longitudinal Strain in Stress Echocardiography: A Review of Its Diagnostic and Prognostic Role in Noninvasive Cardiac Assessment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2025; 15(16): 2076. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162076.

Aggeli C, Lagoudakou S, Felekos I, Panagopoulou V, Kastellanos S, Toutouzas K, et al. Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015; 24(13): 43. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0038-z.

Celutkiene J, Burneikaite G, Petkovicus L, Balkeviciene L, Laucevicius A. Combination of single quantitative parameters into multiparametric model for ischemia detection is not superior to visual assessment during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2016; 14: 13. doi 10.1186/s12947-016-0055-6.

Uusitalo V, Luotolahti M, Pietilä M, Wendelin-Saarenhovi M, Hartiala J, Saraste M, et al. Two-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking during Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2016; 29(5): 470-479.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.12.013.

Cusmà-Piccione M, Zito C, Oreto L, D'Angelo M, Tripepi S, Di Bella G, et al. Longitudinal Strain by Automated Function Imaging Detects Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Dipyridamole Stress Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28(10): 1214-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.001.

Ilardi F, Santoro C, Maréchal P, Dulgheru R, Postolache A, Esposito R, et al. Accuracy of global and regional longitudinal strain at peak of dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect significant coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021; 37(4): 1321-1331. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02121-y.

Smiianov VA, Rudenko SA, Potashev SV, Salo SV, Gavrylyshin AY, Levchyshina EV, et al. Speckle tracking dobutamine stress echocardiography diagnostic accuracy in primary coronary arteries disease diagnosis. Wiad Lek 2020; 73(11): 2447-2456. PMID: 33454682.

Haddad K, Ionescu AL, Pilehvar R, Boivin-Proulx LA, Romanelli G, Poter BJ, et al. Improving stress echocardiography for enhanced detection of left main and multivessel coronary artery disease. CJC Open 2025; 8(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cjco.2025.06.020.

Thomas JD, Edvardsen T, Abraham T, Appadurai V, Badano L, Banchs J, et al. Clinical Applications of Strain Echocardiography: A Clinical Consensus Statement From the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration With the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2025; 38(11): 985-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.07.007.

Woodward W, Dockerill C, McCourt A, Upton R, O'Driscoll J, Balkhausen K, et al. Real-world performance and accuracy of stress echocardiography: the EVAREST observational multi-centre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 23(5): 689-698. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab092.

Mädler CF, Payne N, Wilkenshoff U, Cohen A, Derumeaux GA, Piérard LA, et al. Myocardial Doppler in Stress Echocardiography (MYDISE) Study Investigators. Non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease by quantitative stress echocardiography: optimal diagnostic models using off-line tissue Doppler in the MYDISE study. Eur Heart J 2003; 24(17): 1584-1594. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00099-x.

Sicari R. Relevance of tissue Doppler in the quantification of stress echocardiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia in clinical practice. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2005; 3: 2. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-3-2.

Pellerin D, Sharma R, Elliot P, Veyrat C. Tissue Doppler, strain, and strain rate echocardiography for the assessment of left and right systolic ventricular function. Heart 2003; 89(Suppl III): iii9-iii17. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.suppl_3.iii9.

Voigt JU, Nixdorff U, Bogdan R, Exner B, Schmiedehausen K, Platsch G, et al. Comparison of deformation imaging and velocity imaging for detecting regional inducible ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004; 25(17): 1517-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.05.014.

Wada Y, Murata K, Kimura K, Ueda K, Liu J, Oyama R, et al. Diastolic response during dobutamine stress echocardiography evaluated by a Tissue velocity imaging technique is a sensitive indicator for diagnosing coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16(4): 309-317. doi: 10.1016/S0894-7317(02)74541-0.

Reynolds HR, Diaz A, Cyr DD, Shaw LJ, Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, et al. Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 16(1): 63-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.06.015.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-24

Issue

Section

Original Articles