ANTIBODY SCREENING IN BLOOD DONORS CONTRIBUTES TO BLOOD SAFETY

Authors

  • Elena Ristovska Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Tatjana Makarovska Bojadjieva Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Emilija Velkova Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Elena Petkovikj Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Violeta Dejanova Ilievska Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Bojan Todorovski Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Elena Stojkovska Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia
  • Marija Tashkovska City General Hospital “8th September”, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53582/49gwhh37

Keywords:

Keywords: Antibody screening, irregular RBC antibodies, column agglutination technology (CAT), indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions (DHTR)

Abstract

Screening for irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies is a mandatory test for every blood donation in accordance with national blood testing strategy. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, specificity and frequency of irregular RBC antibodies detected using column agglutination technology (CAT) based on indirect antiglobulin test (IAT).

A total of 252,641 blood donations collected between 2020 and 2024 were screened using pooled screening cells on immune-hematological analyzer (IH 500/1000). Antibody specificity was determined by using commercially available 11-cell identification panel. Donations were obtained from 205,532 male (81%), 47,109 female (19%), and 47,919 first-time donors (17%).

Irregular RBC antibodies were confirmed in 119 donations corresponding to an overall prevalence of 0.05%. The most frequently detected antibody was anti-M (33%), followed by antibodies of the Rh system (22%) and anti-K (15%) antibodies. Antibodies of the Rh system were anti-D (8%), anti-C (2%), anti-E (9%) and anti-c (3%).

Female donors showed a significantly higher prevalence of irregular RBC antibodies (0.11%) than male donors (0.03%). The most frequent anti-M antibody had similar representation in both genders, 0.015% in male and 0.016% in female donors, as a result of the rejuvenation of our donor pool. Also, in female donors more frequent antibodies were anti-K (0.03%), anti-D (0.02%) and anti-E (0.01%). Positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) were more frequent among female donors (0.02%).

The low prevalence reflects effective donor selection and sensitive screening methods. Identification of clinically significant antibodies remains essential for ensuring transfusion safety and preventing hemolytic transfusion reactions.

References

1. GL Daniels, A Fletcher, G Garratty, S Henry, J Jørgensen, WJ Judd, C Levene, C Lomas-Francis, JJ Moulds, JM Moulds, M Moulds, M Overbeeke, M E Reid, P Rouger, M Scott, P Sistonen, E Smart, Y Tani, S Wendel, T Zelinski; Blood group terminology 2004: from the International Society of Blood Transfusion committee on terminology for red cell surface antigens doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2004.00564.x.

2. Daniels G. Functions of red cell surface proteins. Vox Sang. 2007 Nov;93(4):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00970.x.

3. Daniels G, Bromilow I. Essential Gide to Blood Groups. Blackwell publishing, 1st Ed. 2007; 1-5.

4. Poole J, Daniels G. Blood group antibodies and their significance in transfusion medicine. Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21(1): 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2006.08.003.

5. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Mollison's Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine 2014; 12th Oxford, United Kingdom Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

6. Aygun B, Padmanabhan S, Paley C, Chandrasekaran V. Clinical significance of RBC alloantibodies and autoantibodies in sickle cell patients who received transfusions. Transfusion 2002; 42(1): 37-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00007.x.

7. de Castilho LM, Pellegrino J, Jr, Bechelli AP, Le Pennec PY, Mendes NF. Evaluation of recent techniques for detection of red blood cell antibodies in sera of reference samples, patients, pregnant women, and blood donors. J Clin Lab Anal 1996; 10(5): 250-256. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2825(1996)10:5<250::AID-JCLA4>3.0.CO;2-C.

8. Shin JH, Lee JY, Kim JH, Kim HR, Lee JN. Screening and identification of unexpected red cell antibodies by simultaneous LISS/Coombs and NaCl/Enzyme gel methods. J Korean Med Sci 2009; 24(4): 632-635. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.632.

9. Makarovska-Bojadzieva T, Blagoevska M, Kolevski P, Kostovska S. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion. Prilozi 2009; 30(1): 119-128. PMID: 19736535.

10. Železnik K, Marić I. Etiologija, diagnostika in klinični pomen aloimunizacij na eritrocitne antigene. Med Razgl 2025; 64(1): 33-42. doi: 10.61300/MR6401aa4.

11. Solanki A, Chandra T, Singh A. Prevalence of red blood cell antibodies in whole blood donors: A single-centre experience in north India. Indian J Med Res 2020; 152(3): 280-284. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_296_19.

12. Santos LDS, Fernandes SES, Sant'Anna ALO, Amorim FFP, Amorim FFP, Amorim FF. Irregular red blood cell antibodies, abnormal hemoglobin and dangerous universal blood donor insights from a public blood center in a Brazilian metropolitan area. Transfus Apher Sci 2024; 63(4): 103963. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2024.103963.

13. Biljali D, Makarovska-Bojadzieva T, Bozinova-Petkovska A, Azizi Rushiti A. Преваленца на ирегуларни антиеритроцитни антитела кај дарители на крв-споредбена анализа. Medicus ISSN 1409-6366 UDC 61. 2025; 30(2): 241-247,

14. Sivakaanthan A, Hollands S, Powley T, Ismay S, Daly J. Routine donor red cell antibody screening: Considering the alternate strategy. Vox Sang 2022; 117(5): 708-714. doi: 10.1111/vox.13235.

15. Regan Fiona AM. Blood Cell Antigens and Antibodies. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780702066962000217;

16. Reid. M.E., Lomas-Francis,C. (2004). The Blood Group Antigen Facts Book. Academic Press

17. Prathibha B, Ashish J, Neelam M. Frequency of Irregular Red Cell Antibodies in Blood Donor Population. Global Journal of Transfusion Medicine 2019; 4(2): 227-230. doi: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_28_19.

18. Tondon R, Kataria R, Chaudhry R. Anti-M: Report of two cases and review of literature. Asian J Transfus Sci 2008; 2(2): 81-83. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.42695.

19. Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Blood still kills: six strategies to further reduce allogeneic blood transfusion-related mortality. Transfus Med Rev 2010; 24(2): 77-124. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2009.11.001.

20. FDA/CBER: Fatalities reported to the FDA following blood collection and transfusion Annual summary for fiscal year 2008.

21. http://www.fda.gov/cber/blood/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/UCM113649.htm Available at. Accessed September 21, 2009.

22. Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion Annual Summary for FY2018 1 Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion Annual Summary for Fiscal Year 2018. https://www.fda.gov

23. Thomas T, Stefanoni D, Dzieciatkowska M, Issaian A, Nemkov T, Hill RC, et al. Evidence of Structural Protein Damage and Membrane Lipid Remodeling in Red Blood Cells from COVID-19 Patients. J Proteome Res 2020; 19(11): 4455-4469. doi: 10.1021/acs. jproteome.0c00606.

24. Wu Y, Huang P, Xu M, Zhao Q, Xu Y, Han S, Li H, Wang Y. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in healthy adults. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1152899. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1152899.

25. McCullough J. RBCs as Targets of Infection. Hematology 2014; 2014(1): 404-409. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.404.

26. Schultz N, Michelsen AE, Munthe LA, Lund-Johansen F, Ahlen MT, Wiedmann M, et al. PA. N Engl J Med 2021;384(22):2124-2130 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104882

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Issue

Section

Original Articles