WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE, WAIST-TO-HIP RATIO CUT-OFF POINTS TO PREDICT OBESITY AND METABOLIC SYNDROME AMONG STUDENT POPULATION IN SKOPJE, NORTH MACEDONIA

Authors

  • Biljana Zafirova Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Julija Zhivadinovik Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Niki Matveeva Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Biljana Trpkovska Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Elizabeta Chadikovska Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Biljana Bojadgieva Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia
  • Ace Dodevski Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R.N. Macedonia

Keywords:

BMI, WC, WHR, student population

Abstract

Abdominal obesity is the most frequently observed component of metabolic syndrome. Any anthropometric measure is only the first step in identifying people at ‘early health risk’.

This study aimed to determine a cut-off point of selected anthropometric indicators and to analyze the prevalence of normal weight obesity and abdominal obesity among university students.

The study included 839 healthy students aged 18-20 (411 males and 428 females) from the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, R. North Macedonia. The following anthropometric parameters were measured: weight, height, two circumferences (waist WC and hip HC) using a standard protocol. The following indices were taken into consideration: Body Mass Index (BMI), WC and Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR).

The prevalence of obesity across BMI cut-off points among Macedonian students was 22.22%. In the underweight group, the number of female students was significantly higher (12.61% vs 2.19%), while in the overweight and obesity group a higher percentage of male students was observed (27.5% vs 9.11% and 6.81% vs 1.41%). Prevalence of abdominal obesity according to WC and WHR cut-off among Macedonian students were: female had the prevalence of abdominal obesity (overweight and obese) of 25.47% WC and WHR 43.23%, respectively. Both cut-off points for the males were 34.55% WC and 52.81% WHR. However, the Macedonian cut-off points for WC and WHR showed a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity among males.

These results and determination of BMI, WC, WHR cut-off values can be used for the prediction of consequences associated with obesity.

References

Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 2014;311:806–814.

Engin A. The Definition and Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome. Adv Exp Med Biol 2017;960:1-17.

Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G. Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1.8 million participants. Lancet 2014; 383(9921): 970–983.

Ng M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384:766–781.

Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, Shai I, Seidell J, Magni P, Santos RD, Arsenault B, Cuevas A, Hu FB, Griffin BA, Zambon A, Barter P, Fruchart JC, Eckel RH, Matsuzawa Y, Després JP. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2 020;16(3):177-189.

Yang J, Qiu H, Li H, Zhang Y, Tao X, Fan Y. Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference and Cut-Off Points for Metabolic Syndrome in Urban Residents in Ningxia. Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases 2015; 05(12):163-170.

Li G, Yao T, Wu XW, Cao Z, Tu YC, Ma Y, et al. Novel and traditional anthropometric indices for identifying metabolic syndrome in non-overweight/obese adults, 07 August 2020, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square

[https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-52907/v1]

Czernichow S, Kengne AP, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Batty GD. Body mass index, waist circumference and waist-hip ratio: which is the better discriminator of cardiovascular disease mortality risk?: evidence from an individual-participant meta-analysis of 82 864 participants from nine cohort studies. Obes Rev 2011;12(9):680-687.

Głuszek S, Ciesla E, Głuszek-Osuch M, Kozieł D, Kiebzak W, Wypchło Ł, Suliga E. Athropometric indices and cut-off points in the diagnosis of metabolic disorders. PLoS One 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0235121.

Ashwell M, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio as an indicator of ‘early health risk’: simpler and more predictive than using a ‘matrix’ based on BMI and waist circumference. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010159.

Suliga E, Ciesla E, Głuszek-Osuch M, Rogula T, Głuszek S, Kozieł D. The Usefulness of Anthropometric Indices to Identify the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrients 2019; 11(11):2598.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio. Report of WHO Expert Consultation December 2008. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44583/9789241501491_eng.pdf; jsessionid=E5215F3CA2E3F7D645ED72D928A108AB?sequence=1 [Accesed May 2021]

Wang Z, Ma J, Si D. Optimal cut-off values and population means of waist circumference in different populations. Nutrition Research Reviews 2010; 23(2): 191–199.

Preedy VD (ed.), Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012.

CDC. NHANES anthropometry and physical activity monitor procedures manual. 2005. Available from: http://www.cdc. gov/nchs/data/nhanes/ nhanes_05_06/ BM.pdf [Accessed 2021].

Tutunchi H, Ebrahimi-Mameghani M, Ostadrahimi A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. What are the optimal cut-off points of anthropometric indices for prediction of overweight and obesity? Predictive validity of waist circumference, waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratios. Health Promot Perspect 2020;10(2):142-147.

Misra A, Vikram NK, Gupta R, Pandey RM, Wasir JS, Gupta VP. Waist circumference cutoff points and action levels for Asian Indians for identification of abdominal obesity. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30(1):106-11.

doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803111. PMID: 16189502.

Cardinal TR, Vigo A, Duncan BB, Matos SMA, da Fonseca MJM, Barreto SM, Schmidt MI. Optimal cut-off points for waist circumference in the definition of metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adults: baseline analyses of the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Diabetol Metab Syndr 2018;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13098-018-0347-0

da Silva AR, de Sousa LS, Rocha Tde S, Cortez RM, Macêdo LG, de Almeida PC. Prevalence of metabolic components in university students. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2014;22(6):1041-1047. doi:10.1590/0104-1169.0129.2514.

Dalleck LC, Kjelland EM. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic syndrome risk factors in college-aged students. Am J Health Promot 2012;27(1):37-42.

Al-Odat AZ, Ahmad MN, Haddad FH. References of anthropometric indices of central obesity and metabolic syndrome in Jordanian men and women. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2012; 6(1): 15-21.

Sonmez A, Bayram F, Barcin C, Ozsan M, Kaya A, Gedik V. Waist circumference cutoff points to predict obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular risk in Turkish adults. Int J Endocrinol 2013;2013:767202. doi: 10.1155/2013/767202.

Ononamadu CJ, Ezekwesili CN, Onyeukwu OF, Umeoguaju UF, Ezeigwe OC, Ihegboro GO. Comparative analysis of anthropometric indices of obesity as correlates and potential predictors of risk for hypertension and prehypertension in a population in Nigeria. Cardiovasc J Afr 2017;28(2):92-99. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2016-061.

Obeidaat AA, Ahmad MN Haddad FH, Azzeh FS.Evaluation of several anthropometric indices of obesity as predictors of metabolic syndrome in Jordanian adults. Nutr Hosp 2015;32(2):667-677.

Ahmad N, Adam SI, Nawi AM, Hassan MR, Ghazi HF. Abdominal Obesity Indicators: Waist Circumference or Waist-to-hip Ratio in Malaysian Adults Population. Int J Prev Med 2016;(7):82.

Owolabi EO, Ter Goon D, Adeniyi OV, Ajayi AI. Optimal waist circumference cut-off points for predicting metabolic syndrome among low-income black South African adults. BMC Res Notes 2018;11(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3136-9.

Hwaung P, Heo M, Kennedy S, Hong S, Thomas DM, Shepherd J, Heymsfield SB. Optimum waist circumference-height indices for evaluating adult adiposity: An analytic review. Obes Rev 2020;21(1):e12947.

Gearon E, Tanamas SK, Stevenson C, Loh VHY, Peeters A. Changes in waist circumference independent of weight: implications for population-level monitoring of obesity. Prev Med 2018;111:378–383.

Kuk JL, Lee S, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Waist circumference and abdominal adipose tissue distribution: influence of age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:1330–1334.

Feldstein CA, Akopian M, Olivieri AO, Kramer AP, Nasi M, Garrido D. A comparison of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio as indicators of hypertension risk in an urban Argentine population: a hospital-based study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2005;15(4):310-315.

Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med 2017;377:13–27.

Nam GE, Park HS. Perspective on Diagnostic Criteria for Obesity and Abdominal Obesity in Korean Adults. J Obes Metab Syndr 2018;27(3):134-142.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-21

Issue

Section

Original Articles